Free Court DocketsKeep Dockets Free
Bookmark and Share

United States Supreme Court
05-848
Environmental Defense, et al., Petitioners v. Duke Energy Corporation, et al.
Docketed: 1/5/2006
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Case Nos.: 04-1763
Decision Date: 6/15/2005
Rehearing Denied: 8/30/2005
Questions Presented

Environmental Defense, et al., Petitioners V. Duke Energy Corporation, et al.

DateProceedings and Orders
11/15/2005 Application (05A441) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 28, 2005 to January 12, 2006, submitted to The Chief Justice.
11/17/2005 Response to application from respondent Duke Energy Corporation filed.
11/17/2005 Application (05A441) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until December 28, 2005.
12/28/2005 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 6, 2006)
1/31/2006 Order extending time to file response to petition to and including March 8, 2006, for all respondents.
3/7/2006 Brief amici curiae of New York, et al. filed.
3/8/2006 Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
3/8/2006 Brief of respondent Duke Energy Corporation in opposition filed.
3/8/2006 Brief amici curiae of National Parks Conservation Association, et al. filed.
3/21/2006 Reply of petitioners Environmental Defense, et al. filed. (Distributed)
3/22/2006 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 14, 2006.
4/17/2006 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 21, 2006.
4/24/2006 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 28, 2006.
5/8/2006 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 11, 2006.
5/15/2006 Petition GRANTED.
5/22/2006 Extension of time within which to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits to and including July 21, 2006.
6/5/2006 Consent for the filing of amicus briefs in support of either/neither party received from counsel for the respondent.
6/5/2006 Extension of time within which to file the respondent's brief on the merits to and including September 15, 2006.
7/5/2006 Consent to the filing of amicus briefs in support of either party received from counsel for the petitioners.
7/21/2006 Brief amici curiae of Chesapeake Bay Foundation and Adirondack Mountain Club filed.
7/21/2006 Brief amici curiae of STAPPA and ALAPCO
7/21/2006 Brief amici curiae of New Jersey, et al. filed.
7/21/2006 Brief of respondent United States in support filed.
7/21/2006 Joint appendix filed. (Joint appendix in two volumes).
7/21/2006 Brief of petitioners Environmental Defense, et al. filed.
7/21/2006 Brief amici curiae of Law Professors John E. Bonine, et al. filed.
7/21/2006 Brief amici curiae of New York, et al. filed.
7/21/2006 Brief amici curiae of American Lung Association, et al. filed.
7/21/2006 Brief amici curiae of National Parks Conservation Association, et al. filed.
7/21/2006 Brief amici curiae of Former EPA Administrators Carol M.Browner and Russell E. Train filed.
7/21/2006 Brief amici curiae of Current and Former Members of Congress Henry Waxman, et al. filed.
8/14/2006 SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, November 1, 2006.
8/14/2006 CIRCULATED.
9/15/2006 Brief amicus curiae of Manufacturers Association Work Group filed. (Distributed)
9/15/2006 Motion of Alabama, et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae and for divided argument filed.
9/15/2006 Brief of respondent Duke Energy Corporation filed. (Distributed)
9/15/2006 Brief amici curiae of Alabama, et al. filed. (Distributed)
9/15/2006 Brief amicus curiae of Electric Utility Industry filed. (Distributed)
9/15/2006 Brief amicus curiae of APA Watch filed. (Distributed)
9/15/2006 Brief amicus curiae of National Environmental Development Association filed. (Distributed)
9/15/2006 Brief amicus curiae of Walter C. Barber filed. (Distributed)
9/15/2006 Brief amicus curiae of U.S. Representative Joe L Barton filed. (Distributed)
9/15/2006 Brief amici curiae of International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, et al. filed. (Distributed)
9/15/2006 Brief amici curiae of American Public Power Association and National Rural Electric Cooperative Association filed. (Distributed)
9/15/2006 Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed. (Distributed)
9/15/2006 Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed. (Distributed)
9/18/2006 Motion for divided argument filed by the Solicitor General.
9/18/2006 Petitioners' response to motion of Alabama, et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae and for divided argument filed.
9/22/2006 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 25, 2006.
9/28/2006 Record received from U.S.C.A. for 4th Circuit. (1 box)
10/2/2006 Motion of Alabama, et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument DENIED.
10/2/2006 Motion for divided argument filed by the Solicitor General GRANTED.
10/10/2006 Record received from U.S.D.C. for Middle District of North Carolina (Greensboro) (6 boxes)
10/19/2006 Reply of petitioners Environmental Defense, et al. filed. (Distributed).
10/20/2006 Reply of United States as respondent supporting peittioners filed. (Distributed).
10/27/2006 Petitioner's proposed lodging approved and filed (20 copies each of the brief of Industry Petitioners, settlement agreement, and certified CA-4 transcript). DISTRIBUTED.
11/1/2006 Argued. For petitioners: Sean H. Donahue, Washington, D.C. For respondent United States in support of petitioners: Thomas G. Hungar, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. For respondent Duke Energy Corporation: Carter G. Phillips, Washington, D.C.
4/2/2007 Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Souter, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Alito, JJ., joined, and in which Thomas, J., joined as to all but Part III-A. Thomas, J. filed an opinion concurring in part.
5/4/2007 JUDGMENT ISSUED.
6/13/2007 Record returned to U.S.D.C. for the Middle District of North Carolina.
10/30/2007 Record returned to U.S.C.A. for the 4th Circuit.
   
 
Back To Case Summary  
Download Docket   Print Docket   Retrieve Another Docket  


 
Environmental Defense et al. V. Duke Energy Corporation et al., U.S Supreme Court, 05-848